<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4226270155994557787</id><updated>2011-04-21T20:03:08.409-07:00</updated><category term='seo'/><category term='PHP'/><category term='Web Development'/><category term='Web Design'/><category term='MySQL'/><category term='Link Building'/><category term='CSS'/><category term='ppc'/><category term='html'/><category term='Keyword Research'/><category term='How search engines work'/><category term='link baits'/><category term='Link metrics'/><category term='on-page factors'/><title type='text'>Search Engine Optimization/ Pay per Click Guidance</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Hyder Ali Shaikh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11607847335106844654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4226270155994557787.post-758474312194453511</id><published>2008-12-13T03:08:00.002-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-13T03:09:02.733-08:00</updated><title type='text'>How is PageRank calculated?</title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;To calculate the PageRank for a page, all of its inbound links are taken into account. These are links from within the site and links from outside the site. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;span style="color:green;"&gt;PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(t1)/C(t1) + ... + PR(tn)/C(tn))&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;That's the equation that calculates a page's PageRank. It's the original one that was published when PageRank was being developed, and it is probable that Google uses a variation of it but they aren't telling us what it is. It doesn't matter though, as this equation is good enough. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;In the equation 't1 - tn' are pages linking to page A, 'C' is the number of outbound links that a page has and 'd' is a damping factor, usually set to 0.85. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;We can think of it in a simpler way:- &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;span style="color:green;"&gt;a page's PageRank = 0.15 + 0.85 * (a "share" of the PageRank of every page that links to it)&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;"share" = the linking page's PageRank divided by the number of outbound links on the page. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;A page "votes" an amount of PageRank onto each page that it links to. The amount of PageRank that it has to vote with is a little less than its own PageRank value (its own value * 0.85). This value is shared equally between all the pages that it links to. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;From this, we could conclude that a link from a page with PR4 and 5 outbound links is worth more than a link from a page with PR8 and 100 outbound links. The PageRank of a page that links to yours is important but the number of links on that page is also important. The more links there are on a page, the less PageRank value your page will receive from it. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;If the PageRank value differences between PR1, PR2,.....PR10 were equal then that conclusion would hold up, but many people believe that the values between PR1 and PR10 (the maximum) are set on a logarithmic scale, and there is very good reason for believing it. Nobody outside Google knows for sure one way or the other, but the chances are high that the scale is logarithmic, or similar. If so, it means that it takes a lot more additional PageRank for a page to move up to the next PageRank level that it did to move up from the previous PageRank level. The result is that it reverses the previous conclusion, so that a link from a PR8 page that has lots of outbound links is worth more than a link from a PR4 page that has only a few outbound links. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Whichever scale Google uses, we can be sure of one thing. A link from another site increases our site's PageRank. Just remember to avoid links from link farms. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Note that when a page votes its PageRank value to other pages, its own PageRank is not reduced by the value that it is voting. The page doing the voting doesn't give away its PageRank and end up with nothing. It isn't a transfer of PageRank. It is simply a vote according to the page's PageRank value. It's like a shareholders meeting where each shareholder votes according to the number of shares held, but the shares themselves aren't given away. Even so, pages do lose some PageRank indirectly, as we'll see later. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Ok so far? Good. Now we'll look at how the calculations are actually done. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;For a page's calculation, its existing PageRank (if it has any) is abandoned completely and a fresh calculation is done where the page relies solely on the PageRank "voted" for it by its current inbound links, which may have changed since the last time the page's PageRank was calculated. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;The equation shows clearly how a page's PageRank is arrived at. But what isn't immediately obvious is that it can't work if the calculation is done just once. Suppose we have 2 pages, A and B, which link to each other, and neither have any other links of any kind. This is what happens:- &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#990000;"&gt;Step 1: Calculate page A's PageRank from the value of its inbound links&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Page A now has a new PageRank value. The calculation used the value of the inbound link from page B. But page B has an inbound link (from page A) and its new PageRank value hasn't been worked out yet, so page A's new PageRank value is based on inaccurate data and can't be accurate. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#990000;"&gt;Step 2: Calculate page B's PageRank from the value of its inbound links&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Page B now has a new PageRank value, but it can't be accurate because the calculation used the new PageRank value of the inbound link from page A, which is inaccurate. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;It's a Catch 22 situation. We can't work out A's PageRank until we know B's PageRank, and we can't work out B's PageRank until we know A's PageRank. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;Now that both pages have newly calculated PageRank values, can't we just run the calculations again to arrive at accurate values? No. We can run the calculations again using the new values and the results will be more accurate, but we will always be using inaccurate values for the calculations, so the results will always be inaccurate. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;The problem is overcome by repeating the calculations many times. Each time produces slightly more accurate values. In fact, total accuracy can never be achieved because the calculations are always based on inaccurate values. 40 to 50 iterations are sufficient to reach a point where any further iterations wouldn't produce enough of a change to the values to matter. This is precisiely what Google does at each update, and it's the reason why the updates take so long. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;One thing to bear in mind is that the results we get from the calculations are &lt;u&gt;proportions&lt;/u&gt;. The figures must then be set against a scale (known only to Google) to arrive at each page's actual PageRank. Even so, we can use the calculations to channel the PageRank within a site around its pages so that certain pages receive a higher proportion of it than others. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.webworkshop.net/images/spacer.gif" width="100%" height="1" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#990000;"&gt;NOTE:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You may come across explanations of PageRank where the same equation is stated but the result of each iteration of the calculation is &lt;u&gt;added&lt;/u&gt; to the page's existing PageRank. The new value (result + existing PageRank) is then used when sharing PageRank with other pages. These explanations are wrong for the following reasons:- &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.&lt;/b&gt; They quote the same, published equation - but then change it &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;from &lt;span style="color:green;"&gt;PR(A) = (1-d) + d(......)&lt;/span&gt; to &lt;span style="color:green;"&gt;PR(A) = PR(A) + (1-d) + d(......)&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;It isn't correct, and it isn't necessary. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;&lt;b&gt;2.&lt;/b&gt; We will be looking at how to organize links so that certain pages end up with a larger proportion of the PageRank than others. Adding to the page's existing PageRank through the iterations produces different proportions than when the equation is used as published. Since the addition is not a part of the published equation, the results are wrong and the proportioning isn't accurate. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="how_is_pagerank_calculated"&gt;According to the published equation, the page being calculated starts from scratch at each iteration. It relies &lt;u&gt;solely&lt;/u&gt; on its inbound links. The 'add to the existing PageRank' idea doesn't do that, so its results are necessarily wrong. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4226270155994557787-758474312194453511?l=searchengineguidance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/feeds/758474312194453511/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-is-pagerank-calculated.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/758474312194453511'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/758474312194453511'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-is-pagerank-calculated.html' title='How is PageRank calculated?'/><author><name>Hyder Ali Shaikh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11607847335106844654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4226270155994557787.post-3488060383998043276</id><published>2008-12-13T03:08:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-13T03:08:26.934-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="what_is_pagerank"&gt;PageRank is a numeric value that represents how important a page is on the web. Google figures that when one page links to another page, it is effectively casting a vote for the other page. The more votes that are cast for a page, the more important the page must be. Also, the importance of the page that is casting the vote determines how important the vote itself is. Google calculates a page's importance from the votes cast for it. How important each vote is is taken into account when a page's PageRank is calculated.&lt;br /&gt;PageRank is Google's way of deciding a page's importance. It matters because it is one of the factors that determines a page's ranking in the search results. It isn't the only factor that Google uses to rank pages, but it is an important one.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="what_is_pagerank"&gt;From here on in, we'll occasionally refer to PageRank as "PR".&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a name="what_is_pagerank"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#990000;"&gt;Notes:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not all links are counted by Google. For instance, they filter out links from known link farms. Some links can cause a site to be penalized by Google. They rightly figure that webmasters cannot control which sites link to their sites, but they &lt;u&gt;can&lt;/u&gt; control which sites they link out to. For this reason, links into a site cannot harm the site, but links from a site can be harmful if they link to penalized sites. So be careful which sites you link to. If a site has PR0, it is usually a penalty, and it would be unwise to link to it.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4226270155994557787-3488060383998043276?l=searchengineguidance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/feeds/3488060383998043276/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/pagerank-is-numeric-value-that.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/3488060383998043276'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/3488060383998043276'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/pagerank-is-numeric-value-that.html' title=''/><author><name>Hyder Ali Shaikh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11607847335106844654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4226270155994557787.post-3556932334839786086</id><published>2008-12-13T02:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-13T03:56:30.835-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='PHP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Link Building'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='seo'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Keyword Research'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='link baits'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Web Design'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Web Development'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ppc'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CSS'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Link metrics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='MySQL'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='on-page factors'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='How search engines work'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='html'/><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>&lt;h1&gt;What a SEO Professional should know&lt;/h1&gt;     &lt;p&gt;To be a good &lt;acronym title="Search Engine Optimizer"&gt;SEO&lt;/acronym&gt; you need to know a lot of things and to be a professional SEO you need to know them &lt;em&gt;well&lt;/em&gt;. I sometimes see people calling themselves “SEO Experts” looking to make a quick buck …&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let’s just list the things I consider that a good SEO must know:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;HTML&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;As an SEO, knowing HTML is a must. You need to see and understand how the search engines are reading the source code of the web pages. If you can produce nice web sites in Notepad and type HTML without looking at the keyboard then it’s good enough &lt;img src="http://www.jimwestergren.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;&lt;acronym title="Cascading Style Sheets"&gt;CSS&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You don’t need to be a CSS-expert but you need to know all the basics fluently. Tasks can include transforming a &lt;acronym title="Javascript Menu"&gt;JS menu&lt;/acronym&gt; to a CSS menu. Styling heading tags is a daily routine.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Web Design / Web Development&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You should be able to produce nice web sites from scratch without help. At least a basic knowledge is needed and you can outsource the design tasks and use &lt;acronym title="Content Management System"&gt;CMS&lt;/acronym&gt;‘es for your or your clients sites. To be honest, I myself suck at graphics. That’s the major reason why there are no images on this site. But you don’t really need graphics in your SEO work.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;How search engines work&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You need to know how search engines rank pages. That’s a simple sentence but you need to observe, study and test until you know and have a good grasp on how it works. It is a plus if you also know the differences between the &lt;acronym title="Google, Yahoo! and Live"&gt;major search engines&lt;/acronym&gt; in their ranking algorithms.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Keyword Research&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You need to know how to find the best keywords by looking at popularity, competitiveness and relevance. This includes working with &lt;acronym title="Keyword Effectiveness Index"&gt;KEI&lt;/acronym&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;&lt;acronym title="Not to be confused with TrustRank, this is domain based"&gt;Trust&lt;/acronym&gt; with Google&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;A basic understanding is required on what the sandbox is (a kind of filter) and is not (penalty for all new sites) and you need to know some basic things on how a site can gain more trust (trusted links etc.).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Knowing and understanding &lt;acronym title="Actions taken on the page itself, in opposite to off-page"&gt;on-page&lt;/acronym&gt; factors&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;When you review or build a site you should have a checklist to tick off all the on-page factors (perhaps &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/my-guide-to-seo-and-success/"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; will help). You should also know which CMSes are the best to use for different purposes.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Ability to write and craft &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/link-bait/"&gt;link baits&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;A good SEO is a also a good writer. If you cannot write you cannot improve a web sites copy, make good guides, articles and other good content which serves as link baits. A good writer can get links much more easily and if you despise writing perhaps you should look for another job.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Basic knowledge of the social networks&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;With link baits you work with social networks (digg, reddit, furl, del.icio.us, netscape etc.) and you need to know the basics on how they work so that you can use them.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;How to redirect pages&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is only one proper way of redirecting a page or site, the 301 redirect. You need to know how to do it in .htaccess, PHP and ASP and when to do it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Using long-tail&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;The long-tail of search are all the non-competetive big volume of search queries you will get when using a lot of unique good content properly. You need to understand how this works and properly utilize it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Handling duplicate content&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;Part of a SEOs job is removing duplicate content on a site. Any content that shows up same for more than 1 URL should be fixed. This includes the non-www redirect. &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/wordpress-users-sharpen-your-urls-with-google/"&gt;Example with default WordPress&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;&lt;acronym title="An apache module which will allow URL's to be rewritten"&gt;Mod_rewrite&lt;/acronym&gt; with .htaccess&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is something you really need to know in order to make those clean nice URLs. A real bonus if you know how to do it on a windows server with &lt;acronym title="Internet Information Server, Microsoft's Web server that runs on Windows NT/2000 platforms."&gt;IIS&lt;/acronym&gt; (I don’t …).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Link power and how it works (PageRank)&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You need to understand such things like how link power flows through a site (so you can make good internal navigations) and how search engines uses links as a voting mechanism and how it works. This includes working with online SEO tools and &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/checking-backlinks-the-right-way/"&gt;querying search engines for measurements&lt;/a&gt;. You need to know the difference between toolbar PageRank and real PageRank and that PageRank is just one out of 100 factors used in ranking.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Link metrics&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;For each link there are several factors such as the anchor, link position, link relevance, age, surrounding text, C-class IPs and more. This is also important to understand when you start to build links.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Link Building methods&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;There are probably over 20 strategies in getting links. I listed some effective ones over &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/link-building-guide/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. You need to know them and know how to work with them. As an SEO it should be easy for you to get good links, links are vital for SEO.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Basic knowledge of penalties&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;To know what factors that can get give penalties or banning in the search engines are very important. If you don’t know these you can make big mistakes, even unintentionally.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Knowledge of and ability to set up &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/backlink-generator/"&gt;backlink generators&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;As an SEO you need link power in order to power your network of sites, especially if you have many. You should have at least 5 of these running for a big network of 100 sites &lt;acronym title="In my humble opinion"&gt;IMHO&lt;/acronym&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Understanding the supplemental results and know how to get out&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;Things like unique title and meta tags, placing big header information at the end of source code with &lt;acronym title="CSS Positioning"&gt;CSS-P&lt;/acronym&gt;, &lt;acronym title="Links to your internal pages"&gt;deep links&lt;/acronym&gt;, better internal navigation, removing duplicate content and other factors has to be understood and used to take this action.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Basics of PHP / MySQL&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;Many sites are written with PHP and using MySQL. You should have a basic knowledge on how it works (in fact I know very little PHP) so that you can adjust existing code for better SEO. PHPMyAdmin can be your best friend when dealing with the database.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Statistics&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;Your web sites stats are a very important and useful tool, you need to understand how to use it in your SEO.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Competitive Research&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;You need to know what your competitors are doing, how they get their links and how well optimized their sites are. (this one was added by &lt;a href="http://www.completeseo.com/"&gt;Lee Beirne&lt;/a&gt; in the comment below)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Other things&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;Google sitemaps, robots.txt and more. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;Connections with people&lt;/h3&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you are going big and plan to build an empire of own sites and handle a large amount of clients you should have a full list of partners, it will be needed. These includes Web Designers, Content Writers, Link Builders, Programmers, Directory Submitters, Cheap Brokers of &lt;acronym title="PageRank"&gt;PR&lt;/acronym&gt; 6-8 links, buddies that help you in social network sites, SEO Experts that you can ask for advice and more. I currently have 45 partners that I have been using on my list and most of them are experts in a specific field. Many of my partners are located in India or other eastern cheap countries (yes, you can find real good people there). But before you start to use a partner you need to know and understand the thing he is doing and test them on some of your own sites before using them on “real” work. Make sure to inspect and reject work that is not proper. The ideal is that they do the same thing you could have done but you use them to save time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;hr /&gt; &lt;p&gt;Did I miss anything?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I didn’t cover marketing or &lt;acronym title="Search Engine Marketing"&gt;SEM&lt;/acronym&gt; here such as branding, &lt;acronym title="Pay Per Click"&gt;PPC&lt;/acronym&gt; or creating hype - that’s a whole different big field.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Learn more and research on those area you feel you need to learn more on. Did you know all? Good! You are now a &lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1262"&gt;Level 5 SEO&lt;/a&gt;. Now you need to work on becoming a &lt;acronym title="Master SEO"&gt;level 6&lt;/acronym&gt;!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I know all the above subjects, some areas more than others but I have actually stopped providing optimization services as announced &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/important-major-business-decision/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and I am now specialized in link building. If you need help in getting links, feel free to &lt;a href="http://www.jimwestergren.com/contact-me/"&gt; contact me&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4226270155994557787-3556932334839786086?l=searchengineguidance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/feeds/3556932334839786086/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/what-seo-professional-should-know-to-be.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/3556932334839786086'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/3556932334839786086'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/what-seo-professional-should-know-to-be.html' title=''/><author><name>Hyder Ali Shaikh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11607847335106844654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4226270155994557787.post-8769666271039784350</id><published>2008-12-13T02:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-13T02:21:45.089-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>&lt;h1&gt;Boosting Rankings through Social Bookmarking&lt;/h1&gt;   &lt;p&gt;December 13, 2008&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;div style="float: right;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.jonathanleger.com/images/social.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt; If you're not submitting your blog posts, articles and web pages to social bookmarking sites, you're missing out on a lot of link-love that Google looks fondly upon.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;You see, my &lt;a href="http://searchenginemythsexposed.com/" class="external" target="_blank"&gt;Search Engine Myths Exposed&lt;/a&gt; report makes it clear that you don't have to get links from related sites to rank (known in the SEO world as "themed links"). As long as the links come from quality pages, Google will happily count them toward your ranking.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Social Bookmarking sites currently have a lot of value in Google's eyes. Google seems to love sites that rely on democracy to decide what deserves the highest rank (thus their own link-based algorithm). By submitting your pages to these sites, the links will often get crawled and applied to your ranking very quickly — often within a few days.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I've been giving my pages an extra boost by submitting to a few dozen bookmarking sites myself, and I've seen rank increases to the tune of 3 to 5 ranking points on Google's first page of results for my chosen keywords.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I can't share the keywords with you because the sites are in the &lt;a href="http://3waylinks.net/" class="external" target="_blank"&gt;3WayLinks.net&lt;/a&gt; network, and it's against the terms to share that information. Suffice it to say that the keywords are competitive enough to provide hundreds of visitors per day with my current rankings. That's one of the things I love about 3WayLinks.net — it provides a solid link base on which to build your rankings for tougher keywords.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A couple of great tools to use when submitting to SBMs are &lt;a href="http://www.socialmarker.com/" class="external" target="_blank"&gt;SocialMarker.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.onlywire.com/" class="external" target="_blank"&gt;OnlyWire.com&lt;/a&gt;. SocialMarker.com makes the process of submitting your sites semi-automated, whereas OnlyWire.com fully automates the submission. Both are good tools that are worth looking into (and both are free).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;When submitting your pages to social bookmarking sites, set your title tag to the keywords that you want to rank for to get the most value from Google for your links. If you're interested in generating traffic from the bookmarking sites themselves, you'll want to modify your titles to be appealing to viewers as well.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;For instance, if you want to rank for the phrase "old time radio", just set your title to "old time radio." But if you want to draw visitors, "Old time radio - Thousands of free MP3 shows!" would work much better. Keep in mind, though, that you sacrifice some link value when the link to your site is not your exact keywords.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If your site is brand new, vary your titles so that the links pointing to your site do not all contain the same keywords. If your site is already established with lots of links, a few dozen links with the same link text is not going to be a problem, and it's safe to just use your main keywords as the titles.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you're hoping to draw visitors from social bookmarking sites to an AdSense revenue site, keep in mind that visitors at bookmarking sites are notorious for never clicking on your ads. If your only form of revenue on the site is AdSense, you might want to word your titles for maximum SEO value and forgo the visitors directly from the sites.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Let me close with another good social bookmarking experience. A friend of mine setup a site that he wanted to rank for a "low hanging fruit" set of keywords (razor targeted for great conversion rates, but without getting hundreds of visitors a day). He asked for my advice, and I offered to submit his site to the social bookmarking sites for him.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He agreed, and I did so. At the time of the submission his site was stuck on page 3 of Google's results. A few days later he freaked out because his site disappeared from the rankings (this is typical when a new site gets a bunch of links quickly–your site will often disappear while Google recalculates your ranking). But about a week after that his site jumped onto page 2 of Google. Not long after that he was on page one. Now he's one happy camper, and it was thanks to social bookmarking links!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So when you're out looking for places to get links from, don't forget about social bookmarking sites. They won't perform miracles with your rankings, but they certainly give a solid boost.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div style="background-color: whitesmoke;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Added:&lt;/b&gt; A few comments below made an important point. Don't overdo your submissions or some of the bookmarking sites may ban your account, IP or domain from submitting to them. I personally only submit to each of the sites a couple of times per day, spaced out over the day.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;p&gt;I'd love to know what you think!  Please leave your thoughts and questions in a comment below. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4226270155994557787-8769666271039784350?l=searchengineguidance.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/feeds/8769666271039784350/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/boosting-rankings-through-social.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/8769666271039784350'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4226270155994557787/posts/default/8769666271039784350'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://searchengineguidance.blogspot.com/2008/12/boosting-rankings-through-social.html' title=''/><author><name>Hyder Ali Shaikh</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11607847335106844654</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry></feed>
